Initial consultation and scoping
IWRE clarifies the research question, the intended use of the findings, key stakeholders, the evidence already available, practical constraints and the desired timescale.
IWRE’s approach
A structured process. A tailored methodology.
IWRE designs research around the decisions an organisation needs to make, rather than applying the same methods to every project.
How projects work
From the first question to actionable findings.
Each engagement follows six stages, adapted to the nature and scale of the project.
Research design and proposal
IWRE selects appropriate qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and prepares a written proposal setting out the methodology, deliverables, timetable, responsibilities and project fee.
Data collection and engagement
Once the proposal is agreed, evidence is gathered through the agreed methods, such as surveys, interviews or document review, with participant information and consent arrangements where relevant.
Analysis and interpretation
The evidence is analysed to identify patterns, differences and themes. The quality of the evidence is assessed, and limitations and uncertainty are made explicit.
Reporting and recommendations
Findings are presented clearly, distinguishing between evidence, interpretation and recommended action. A briefing or presentation of findings may be included where agreed.
Optional follow-up evaluation or support
Where commissioned, IWRE reviews implementation, progress or emerging outcomes against agreed measures, or supports the organisation in acting on the findings.
Proposals and timescales
Clear terms before work begins.
Every project proposal identifies the agreed methodology, deliverables, timetable, responsibilities and project fee. Work begins only once these, together with contractual terms and data protection arrangements, have been agreed.
Timescales depend on the scope of the project, access to participants, the availability of existing data and any internal approvals required.
A focused research engagement may be planned around approximately six weeks, subject to scope, participant access and project requirements. Broader lifecycle reviews and evaluations may require longer, and evaluations of ongoing programmes may be planned around the programme’s own timetable.
Methods
Use the evidence the question requires.
Depending on the engagement, methods may include staff surveys, interviews, facilitated discussions, document analysis, analysis of existing workforce data and structured programme evaluation.
Research design should follow the question—not the other way around.
Research standards
Careful handling, transparent reporting.
Safeguards are tailored to each project and agreed before data collection begins.
ETHICS
Respectful participation
Projects consider informed and voluntary participation, potential power imbalances and the appropriate handling of sensitive topics.
DATA PROTECTION
Confidentiality and privacy
Data protection roles, lawful bases, access, retention and any data-sharing requirements are defined before personal information is handled.
ANALYSIS
Rigour and limitations
Analytical methods are chosen to be defensible, limitations are reported, and conclusions are not drawn beyond what the evidence supports.
Better workforce decisions begin with better evidence.
Discuss an independent research or evaluation project tailored to your organisation.